-
No. We teach people that they have rights, and that these rights are secured by the principal documents that guarantee our civil liberties -- the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. An informed individual who invokes his constitutional protections is doing exactly what our nation's founders intended. They created these documents to...
-
No. If a police officer asks your permission to search, you are under no obligation to consent. The main reason why officers ask is because they don't have enough evidence to search without your consent. Don't expect an officer to tell you of your right not to consent. Any time you consent to a search request you are naively waiving your constitutional rights.
-
Your rights do not disappear if the officer threatens to call in the dogs, so don't let this all-too-common tactic intimidate you into consenting to a search. You have several options...
-
No. We believe that most police officers are good, hardworking people who are doing a tough job. We need police to safeguard the life, liberty, and property of all people. To do this best, police officers should...
-
This is a tricky issue. The simple answer is that citizens who are minding their own business are not obligated to "show their papers" to police. In fact, there is no law requiring citizens to carry identification of any kind. Once you get passed the surface, however, things get much more complicated...
-
Unfortunately, many people get fooled by some version of this commonly used police officer's line: "Everything will be easier if you just cooperate". That's true to some extent -- it will make things much easier for the police officer who's trying to arrest you! -- but when it comes to you consenting to searches and answering incriminating questions, it couldn't be further from the truth...
-
College students suffer from an unfortunate lack of privacy rights in many situations. The university owns the dorm, so school officials can often search rooms at their own discretion. College students still have 4th Amendment rights that apply in other situations...
-
In addition to compromising your safety and the safety of others, driving drunk is one of the stupidest things you can do, and one of the easiest ways to create overwhelming legal problems for yourself. DUI laws vary from state to state, and they have become increasingly harsh over the years...
-
Videotaping or photographing police in public places is usually legal, so long as you don't interfere with their activities. Nonetheless, doing so will often get you arrested...
-
As a general rule, searches conducted without a valid search warrant signed by a judge violate the Fourth Amendment, but like most rules of law, there are a number of explicit exceptions. In fact, most searches occur without warrants because police take advantage of these exceptions to the Fourth Amendment...
-
Simply put, the number of arrests an officer makes is a major factor used to determine his job performance. Police officers know that the easiest way to make arrests is to find people in possession of illegal drugs, so they want to search everyone they can find...
-
During a legitimate traffic stop, police may order the driver and any passengers out of the vehicle. This rule is intended to protect officers' safety, but it's often used for investigatory purposes...
-
Yes. Police can, will, and often do lie; especially if it helps them make arrests. The rules regarding entrapment usually tip in favor of law-enforcement, so police won't hesitate to trick you into incriminating yourself or others...
-
No. The courts have made it clear that police officers do not have to tell people that they can refuse to consent to a warrantless search. Also, contrary to the belief perpetuated by popular police television shows, a person will not be read their rights subsequent to being taken into custody. A person only needs to be Mirandized when...
-
Traffic stops typically occur as a result of suspected moving violations committed by the driver of the vehicle. Passengers cannot be held responsible for the driver's conduct and are generally free to leave, unless police become suspicious of them during the course of the stop...
|
Written by Micah Daigle, SSDP
|
|
Monday, 23 June 2008 18:16 |
|
ACT NOW: Ask your state legislators to enact a life-saving Good Samaritan Policy. http://www.ssdp.org/savelives Twenty-two years ago, the tragic overdose death of a rising basketball star sparked a reactionary scare across the United States, resulting in the creation of the most destructive drug policies to date. Len Bias, a University of Maryland forward who was thought by many to be "the next Michael Jordan," died of a cocaine overdose less than 48 hours after being drafted by the Boston Celtics. Because Congress rushed to create mandatory minimum sentences for small amounts of drugs, more than half a million Americans will go to sleep behind bars tonight, simply for nonviolent drug offenses. This is the legacy of Len Bias. But this does not need to be his legacy. A Good Samaritan Policy could have saved Len Bias's life. These policies exempt people from punishment if they call 911 to report an overdose emergency, and nearly 100 colleges and the entire state of New Mexico have had the good sense to adopt them. A Good Samaritan Policy eliminates the dilemma that Bias's friends were faced with when he went unconscious that night: Call for help and risk arrest, or hope that he sleeps it off? Tragically, as drug laws have become increasingly punitive following Bias's death, countless lives have been lost as a result of the paralyzing fear created by the unforgiving War on Drugs. But by urging your state legislators to enact a life-saving Good Samaritan Policy, you can join with tens of thousands of Students for Sensible Drug Policy members in reversing the legacy of Len Bias. It takes just a few clicks to send a pre-written letter to your elected officials: http://www.ssdp.org/savelives SSDP has already made great strides in our Good Samaritan Policy campaign. Dozens of SSDP chapters are working closely with their schools' administrators on enacting these policies and seven have succeeded so far. Additionally, several chapters have been involved in pushing forward state-wide legislation that has been introduced in Illinois, Maryland, Rhode Island, and Washington. And many chapter members are working collaboratively on compiling research on Good Samaritan policies so that we can be well-equipped to hit the ground running in the fall semester. And you can help build this momentum. Please ask your state lawmakers to follow New Mexico's lead by enacting a Good Samaritan Policy: http://www.ssdp.org/savelives One day, we will look back in disbelief at the way people with drug problems were treated with such indifference because we were too focused on jailing them instead of helping them. With your help, our policies will be rooted in health and compassion rather than prejudice and punishment. And that will be the final legacy of Len Bias. Sincerely, Micah Daigle SSDP National Field Director P.S. If you'd like to stay informed via email, sign up for SSDP's action list at: http://www.ssdp.org/subscribe P.P.S. If you are a student wishing to get involved in enacting a Good Samaritan Policy on your campus, you can find out more about the campaign at http://www.ssdp.org/goodsamaritan or contact us about starting an SSDP chapter: http://www.ssdp.org/chapters/start
Share this with the world: 
|
|
What are we doing?
The 4th Amendment Podcast
|
|
Comments