-
Yes. Police can, will, and often do lie; especially if it helps them make arrests. The rules regarding entrapment usually tip in favor of law-enforcement, so police won't hesitate to trick you into incriminating yourself or others...
-
Unfortunately, police may sometimes search you even if you refuse consent. If they find anything illegal, you'll have to get a lawyer and fight it out in court, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the search will hold up...
-
No. The courts have made it clear that police officers do not have to tell people that they can refuse to consent to a warrantless search. Also, contrary to the belief perpetuated by popular police television shows, a person will not be read their rights subsequent to being taken into custody. A person only needs to be Mirandized when...
-
No. The Supreme Court has never ruled that police must present the warrant when performing a search. The purpose of the warrant is to...
-
Unfortunately, many people get fooled by some version of this commonly used police officer's line: "Everything will be easier if you just cooperate". That's true to some extent -- it will make things much easier for the police officer who's trying to arrest you! -- but when it comes to you consenting to searches and answering incriminating questions, it couldn't be further from the truth...
-
This is a tricky issue. The simple answer is that citizens who are minding their own business are not obligated to "show their papers" to police. In fact, there is no law requiring citizens to carry identification of any kind. Once you get passed the surface, however, things get much more complicated...
-
During a legitimate traffic stop, police may order the driver and any passengers out of the vehicle. This rule is intended to protect officers' safety, but it's often used for investigatory purposes...
-
No. We believe that most police officers are good, hardworking people who are doing a tough job. We need police to safeguard the life, liberty, and property of all people. To do this best, police officers should...
-
Be aware that private security personnel outnumber police officers in the United States by three to one. As a result, you may be more likely to be confronted by a security guard than by a police officer. You must also be aware of the following places where security personnel (governmental or otherwise) are permitted to search you without a warrant...
-
No. If a police officer asks your permission to search, you are under no obligation to consent. The main reason why officers ask is because they don't have enough evidence to search without your consent. Don't expect an officer to tell you of your right not to consent. Any time you consent to a search request you are naively waiving your constitutional rights.
-
Traffic stops typically occur as a result of suspected moving violations committed by the driver of the vehicle. Passengers cannot be held responsible for the driver's conduct and are generally free to leave, unless police become suspicious of them during the course of the stop...
-
Your rights do not disappear if the officer threatens to call in the dogs, so don't let this all-too-common tactic intimidate you into consenting to a search. You have several options...
-
Simply put, the number of arrests an officer makes is a major factor used to determine his job performance. Police officers know that the easiest way to make arrests is to find people in possession of illegal drugs, so they want to search everyone they can find...
-
Generally not. The Bill of Rights protections that matter most during police encounters are mandated by the U.S. Constitution as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court, and all states are required to follow them. States can offer more protection of these rights, but not less. There are some variations regarding...
-
This is one of those "it depends on the circumstances" questions. Police can obtain consent to search from anyone with control over the property; however any occupant of a residence can refuse consent, even if other occupants agree to a search. Unfortunately, you must be present in order to assert your refusal. The Supreme Court has ruled that...
|
Florida Voting Rights Report - Acknowledgements & Notes |
|
|
|
|
Written by Muslima Lewis, ACLU of FLorida
|
|
Page 7 of 7
ABOUT THE ACLU OF FLORIDA:
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is the nation's premier guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States. Since our founding in 1920, the nonprofit, nonpartisan ACLU has grown from a roomful of civil liberties activists to an organization of over 500,000 members and supporters, with offi ces in almost every state. The ACLU of Florida, with headquarters in Miami, is the local affi liate of the national organization. Chartered in 1965, the ACLU of Florida operates with the help of 36 staff members, 18 volunteer-run chapters and 30,000 members across the state. The ACLU's voting rights work focuses on ensuring that the political process is open and accessible to all, by implementing at every level of the political process the equal voting rights guarantees of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and acts of Congress designed to ensure equality in voting.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Muslima Lewis is a Senior Staff Attorney and Director of the ACLU of Florida's Racial Justice and Voting Rights Projects.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
The author would like to thank the entire ACLU of Florida staff, especially La Rhonda Odom, Elton Edwards, Brandon Hensler and Executive Director Howard Simon, ACLU of Florida interns Mark Schonfeld, Maria Sciolto, and especially Rita Thomas, Rachel Bloom and Nicole Kief of the ACLU Racial Justice Program, Mark Schlakman, senior program director at Florida State University's Center for the Advancement of Human Rights, and Florida Rights Restoration Coalition members and supporters. The statements made and views expressed in this paper are the sole responsibility of the ACLU of Florida. The ACLU of Florida thanks the Florida Bar Foundation for its generous support of the ACLU of Florida's civil rights restoration initiatives.
Notes:
- Jeff Manza and Christopher Uggen, Locked Out: Felony Disenfranchisement and American Democracy, (Oxford University Press) (2006) at 248. These estimates of Florida's disfranchised population are based on Manza and Uggen's analysis of statistics dated as of December 1, 2004.
- Id.
- See Out of Step with the World: An Analysis of Felony Disfranchisement in the U.S. and Other Democracies, Laleh Ispahani, American Civil Liberties Union (May 2006).
- Manza and Uggen, supra note 1, at 76.
- Manza and Uggen, supra note 1, at 248.
- See Reducing Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice System, A Manual for Practitioners and Policymakers, The Sentencing Project (Second Ed. 2008)
- Manza and Uggen, supra note 1, at 251.
- Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States, The Sentencing Project (2008).
- See Appendix A for the state constitutional and statutory provisions relating to felony disfranchisement.
- Rules of Executive Clemency, 9A, adopted September 10, 1975, effective November 1, 1975.
- Before 2007, some rule changes were designed to remove some restrictions on restoration of civil rights eligibility. However, these changes did little to increase the number of civil rights restoration grants. For example, in 2004, the rules were changed to allow civil rights restored without a hearing for people convicted of less serious offenses who remained arrest-free for fi ve years and for all otherwise eligible persons who remained arrest-free for fi fteen years. See Rules of Executive Clemency, revised December 9, 2004, effective December 9, 2004.
- Information about recent RCR grants and the average number of RCR grants annually prior to 2007 was provided by the Parole Commission.
- De Facto Disenfranchisement, Erika Wood and Rachel Bloom, American Civil Liberties Union and Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. (2008)
- Fla. Stat. Section 98.075 (5) and (7) (2005)
- Estimates of people ineligible for RCR due to unpaid restitution obligations were provided in 2007 by then Department of Corrections Secretary James McDonough.
- Final Report of the Governor's Ex-Offender Task Force, at 27 (2006).
- Rules for Restoration of Civil Rights for Felons and Impacts on Obtaining Occupational Licenses and Other Opportunities, S. 2008-114, at 8 (2007).
- See Governor Charlie Crist's 2007 inaugural address at http://www.flgov.com/speech2007inaugural.
- Fla. Stat. Section 14.28 (2008)
Share this with the world: 
|
|
What are we doing?
The 4th Amendment Podcast
|
|